Verifiable quality

Accessibility

Commitments, testing method, audit status and contact options to improve the accessibility of the Edikka website.

Key points

Accessibility should be measured, not merely claimed.

Edikka treats accessibility as production quality: HTML structure, keyboard navigation, contrast, text alternatives, forms, reduced motion and compatibility with assistive technologies.

RGAA

Targeted grid

The 13 RGAA 4.1.2 topics and 106 criteria are mapped to the priority templates.

84

Professional checks

Keyboard, reflow, ARIA, accessible names, images and accessibility tree checks: 0 local failure.

76

URLs checked

The broad accessibility crawl reported no issue and no fetch failure on the public content sample.

100

Lighthouse scores

Home, contact FR, contact EN and accessibility reached 100 in accessibility, performance, best practices and SEO.

1. Commitment

Edikka is committed to making its website accessible to as many people as possible, with attention to keyboard navigation, document structure, contrast, text alternatives, forms and reduced-motion preferences.

The goal is not only to remove issues detected by automated tools. The goal is to maintain verifiable quality for people using a keyboard, a screen reader, enlarged display settings or constrained browsing conditions.

2. Conformance status

The edikka.com website is undergoing an enhanced RGAA 4.1.2 pre-audit. The targeted grid covers the 13 RGAA topics and the 106 official criteria on the priority templates. The technical results are very favourable, but Edikka does not yet publish a final conformance score until the remaining human validations are complete.

Automated checks, including WAVE, are monitored but do not replace manual tests: focus order, keyboard navigation, relevance of image alternatives, link clarity, zoom, heading structure and assistive technology behavior.

A quantified statement will be published here after the representative audit, including the percentage of RGAA criteria met, the tested pages and any remaining non-conformities.

3. Testing method

The full audit is conducted on a representative sample of the website’s pages and journeys.

  • Homepage, agency, expertise pages, project pages, insights, FAQ, contact, legal notice, privacy policy and 404 page.
  • Targeted RGAA 4.1.2 grid: 13 topics, 106 criteria, applicability and evidence by template.
  • Automated tests: WAVE, axe or equivalent, Lighthouse and HTML validation where relevant.
  • Browser tests: keyboard, focus order, 320/390 px reflow, Chrome accessibility tree, contrast, text alternatives, forms and multimedia content.
  • Verification of user preferences, including reduced-motion behavior.

4. Already in place

  • A skip link allows keyboard users to reach the main content directly.
  • Menus use ARIA states to communicate opening and closing behavior.
  • Main forms use labels associated with their fields.
  • Zoom is not blocked by the viewport.
  • Animations are disabled when the user requests reduced motion.
  • Public quality checks, including WAVE, are available from the “Verifiable quality” section.

5. Improvements in progress

  • Close the remaining human validations on the targeted RGAA 4.1.2 grid.
  • Document a real screen reader pass: VoiceOver Safari and, if possible, NVDA Firefox.
  • Manually review text alternatives for informative images.
  • Validate contrast in real states: desktop, mobile, focus, hover and editorial blocks.
  • Review video content, captions and useful alternatives.
  • Document completed corrections on this page.

6. Accessibility contact

If you have difficulty accessing content or a feature on the website, you can contact Edikka to request a correction or an accessible alternative.

7. Remedies

If you report an accessibility issue that prevents access to content or a feature and do not receive a satisfactory response, you may contact the French Defender of Rights.

8. Follow-up and updates

This page will be updated after each major step: audit completion, blocking issue correction, publication of a conformance score or evolution of the reference standard.

  • June 2026: accessibility page published and representative audit started.
  • July 2026: conformance score and any remaining corrections published.
  • Afterwards: regular checks when major changes are made to the website.